Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/uspatri1/public_html/index.php:32) in /home/uspatri1/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wp-super-cache/wp-cache-phase2.php on line 1197
ATF Director Resigns After Proposed Ammo Ban: Is That Enough? | U.S. PATRIOT NEWS & REVIEWS

ATF Director Resigns After Proposed Ammo Ban: Is That Enough?

It is well known by now that the ATF attempted to ban M855/SS109 ammunition recently based on an exaggerated, if not false, claim that the bullet was armor piercing and there were pistols chambered in that round. The ban did not go through, as there was a very large and very negative reaction to it. That is one bit of good news. The other bit of good news is that the Director, B. Todd Jones, resigned after this failed attempt at backdoor gun control.

The bad news, however, is that the ATF, at this point, is still able to make rules and act as a political body, rather than an enforcement agency only. So, great, the director resigned and the ban did not go through; the agency as a whole still has authority to create rules on the fly and that is unacceptable. At some point, if the ATF remains capable of creating rules and regulations, this ammo, among others, will be banned. Until a bill is passed that makes the ATF only capable of enforcing laws, there is a real risk of “laws” being created by a non-political body which, currently, thinks along the lines of the United Nations, which is not very conducive to the American Spirit, nor the Second Amendment.

ATF SideNo agency should be capable of making and enforcing laws, as that is a conflict of interest and the opposite of the ideals of our Founding Fathers. If the governing bodies are the enforcing bodies, then there is a monopoly of power that conflicts with the concept of our nation. At some point, this must either end, or it will end our freedoms. There are currently bills in place that would, if enacted, limit the power of the ATF and help to prevent them from making laws. Rep. Tom Rooney (R-FL) would simply limit the ATF’s ability to regulate ammunition, while Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-WI) proposed a bill that would completely shut down the ATF.

I, for one, believe that an agency such as the ATF should exist, but not as the ATF exists now. The change would be significant enough that the ATF we know today would have to close its doors and a new agency put in place. The new agency, call it what you will, would only be able to enforce laws and regulations, not make them. The main focus of the new agency, in regards to firearms, would by in large investigate large firearms-related crimes and ensure that firearms makers who produce products that need to be recalled for safety reasons are doing just that. They would have no say in who could own a firearm, what firearms are legal, what ammunition can be used or how a firearm can be employed.

So, no, the ban did not go through and the director who oversaw this attempt has resigned, but no, it is not enough. The ATF is a threat to our rights and is in direct conflict with our founding ideals. There will eventually be a breaking point where either the ATF has so much power that the people have no voice, or the people stand tall and demand reforms that restrict their functions in such a way that it removes the monopoly of power that has been created by the ATF.

Disclaimer: The content in this article is the opinion of the writer and does not necessarily reflect the policies or opinions of US Patriot Tactical.

Seth Belt

Seth grew up in Southern Arizona before joining the U.S. Navy. While serving in the Navy, Seth was an anti-narcotics operator and an anti-submarine operator for 5 years. He was lucky enough to travel to many of the Central and South American countries, as well as visiting many South East Asian nations and islands. One of Seth’s greatest joys from his time in the Navy was teaching new Sailors firearms education and safety. After leaving the Navy in 2010, Seth returned to Arizona and had a rough time learning how to be a civilian again, often working jobs that could barely pay the bills. After going to school, Seth became an Emergency Medical Technician in the Phoenix Valley, where he now lives with his wife and son.His areas of knowledge cover military, firearms, and emergency medicine.
Seth Belt

1 thought on “ATF Director Resigns After Proposed Ammo Ban: Is That Enough?

  1. There are lots of examples of agencies making rules, ordinances, regulations etc. The ATF does not have that privilege (and it is a privilege) to itself. In some cases, it is known as delegated legislation in some quarters, because the power to make these rules is usually delegated from the legislature. In other cases, it may be a power delegated from th executive arm of government. Either way, it should be neither unfettered nor without accountability. Ultimately, it is the originating source of the delegated power that ought to be held responsible. In the end, the director of the ATF is simple a public official. If you want to ensure that this type of thing does not happen in the future, you need to shin the light on those who gave the power to the director and then failed to adequately oversight how h used that power.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *